PLEASE ACT NOW!!
The emerging southern site apartment blocks on Broadwater Road, March 2021
The sky SHOULD NOT be the limit for the Shredded Wheat site. We shouldn’t allow the Wheat Quarter “reach for the sky” if we are to keep the Garden City a ‘Garden’ City. The developer’s new plan seeks to build a mini-metropolis in the heart of our town. Have your say now!
Many residents are dismayed at the revised planning application for the Shredded Wheat site, currently open for comments on the WHBC planning website. Full details of how to object and suggested points you may want to raise are given below.
The southern site from the railway bridge
In summary, the consent is now being sought for:
Blocks of 9, 10 or 11 storeys, totalling of nearly 2500 flats/apartments. The Council’s own plan for the area – the Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) – states that only in exceptional circumstances should anything over 5 storeys be considered. The SPD states homes should be a mix of flats and houses. Neither of the Wheat Quarter sites propose anything other than flats. The BioPark site is offering about ten houses, all the rest being flats. You may recall the mass opposition to the Tesco (Spenhill) plan for this site some years ago. That was thrown out by the council because it contravened the SPD, now we have another application that also significantly contravenes the Council’s own planning statement for the site. It took huge local opposition to get the Tesco proposal rejected. Time is short for residents to make their voice heard on this new plan, so we urge you to act right now.
There is Council policy about a mix of private and social housing on new sites. The proportion of social rented housing here adds up to about 6%, far less than the Council’s target of 15%.
The uninviting frontage of the ‘Wheat Quarter’ currently, with it’s fetching iron barred windows.
Details of the building’s heritage status listing can be found here: https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1101084
The WHBC Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) from 2008 can be found on their website by CLICKING HERE.
If you want to comment (Objecting) to the Broadwater Road Proposals online please follow these steps:
Click on, or copy and paste the following into your web browser address bar:
To object to the Wheat Quarter proposal, 552 dwellings:
Full Planning Application:
https://planning.welhat.gov.uk/Planning/Display/6/2021/0181/MAJ
Link to comment page:
https://planning.welhat.gov.uk/Planning/Comment/6/2021/0181/MAJ
To object to the Wheat Quarter South Site proposal for 721 flats (currently under construction):
Full Planning Application:
https://planning.welhat.gov.uk/Planning/Display/6/2021/0671/MAJ
Link to comment page:
https://planning.welhat.gov.uk/Planning/Comment/6/2021/0671/MAJ
To object to the BioPark proposal, 289 dwellings:
Full Planning Application:
https://planning.welhat.gov.uk/Planning/Display/6/2020/3420/MAJ
Link to comment page:
https://planning.welhat.gov.uk/Planning/Comment/6/2020/3420/MAJ
Enter your name, email address and postcode in the data boxes provided. Click on “Find Address” to select your address.
In the “Type of Response” box please ensure you select the appropriate kind of response – either “Comment”, “Support” or “Objection”.
In the “Comments” box enter your comments (up to 1,000 characters – about 150 words).
You can add more in a separate attachment if you want to but it has to
Click on the green “Submit” box at the bottom of the form.
Alternatively you can send your objections as an email to the case officer: c.howe@welhat.gov.uk
Suggested Objection to Proposal 6/2021/0181/MAJ – The Wheat Quarter
The new proposal increases the number of dwellings by 50% from 811 to 1220, and building height to 9 storeys. This contradicts the Broadwater Road SPD limiting building to five storeys except in exceptional circumstances. The development hides the Shredded Wheat silos and production hall. It will compromise the Broadwater Road street scene, overpowering the art deco Griffin Place and Mirage developments to the south. It is inappropriate for a Garden City, being too dense in nature (264 dwellings per hectare compared with 141 for a typical London social housing estate) and lacking greenery. It has no kinship with our unique town. It will house approximately 1200 more people than the 2019 application, making the local infrastructure inadequate to sustain a development large enough to form a new Ward in the town. Other sites within the borough, such as villages with high public transport accessibility, appear to have been ignored despite their suitability for development.
Suggested Objection Grounds to Proposal 6/2020/3420/MAJ – The BioPark:
Here 289 units are proposed to house 852 people in a very restricted site, with building height to 9 storeys. This contradicts WHBC’s own vision for Broadwater Road west which was to integrate the spirit of the Garden City with the very best of 21st century design. There is nothing of the Garden City spirit here. The development is clearly seen from the west side Conservation Area, as well as from Hatfield House. It will compromise the Broadwater Road street scene, overpowering the art deco and Mirage developments to the south. It is inappropriate for a Garden City due to its large scale, high density of homes and minimal greenery. It has no kinship with our unique town. This development offers only 216 parking spaces for 289 homes. There is no example where a development without adequate car parking has worked. Other sites within the borough, such as villages with high public transport accessibility, appear to have been ignored despite their suitability for development.
Suggested Objection Grounds to Proposal 6/2021/0671/MAJ – South Site:
The new proposal increases the number of dwellings from 643 to 929 and building height to 10 storeys. This contradicts the Broadwater Road SPD limiting building to five storeys except in exceptional circumstances. The development will compromise the Broadwater Road street scene, overpowering the neighbouring art deco Griffin Place and Mirage developments. It is inappropriate for a Garden City, being too dense in nature and lacking greenery. It will be even more crowded than Manhattan in central New York (793 people per hectare compared with an average of 275 in Manhattan). It has no kinship with our unique town. It will house just over 900 more people than proposed in the 2019 application. The local infrastructure is inadequate to sustain this many extra people.
Other sites within the borough, such as villages with high public transport accessibility, appear to have been ignored despite their suitability for development.
You can of course also make your views know to your local Borough Councillor. Those who sit on the Development Management Committee may not be willing to speak out as we are now in the Local Election purdah period, but the others should. With an election looming you may want to ask them where they themselves stand on this extremely important issue for the town. But it is more important to put in your objection as above.
You can find details of all Councillors here: https://democracy.welhat.gov.uk/mgUserInfo.aspx?UID=321
Details of the Development Management Committee and those who sit on it are here: https://democracy.welhat.gov.uk/mgCommitteeDetails.aspx?ID=156
The sorry state of the grade 2 listed former Shredded Wheat building. With no external maintenance for a decade it appears as if the owners would like it to become beyond economical repair.
Historic England sets out its guidance for listed building owners in the following link. It points out that local councils also have powers to ensure maintenance is carried out. To the Society’s knowledge this has never been pursued by WHBC. See here: https://historicengland.org.uk/advice/hpg/assistanceforowners/maintenance/#Section2Text
Administrator |
Local Plan, Shredded Wheat |
03 21st, 2021 |
Comments Off on Object now to the latest Broadwater Road (Shredded Wheat) proposals
